Welcome to the bleeding heart liberalism, Yankees fandom, Trekker and Lego geekdom and science nerdery and newshoundishness of BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER, praised by no less than ThinkProgress and Time Magazine and Buzzfeed and Comedy Central and Funny Or Die and it's all true! Read all about me.

Movie Score A Day
Ask me questions!

Site Meter

 RSS Me!


Evening News Read 21 November 2013.

Morning News Read 9 October 2013

(Hilarious stock photo by Shutterstock via the Post)

Morning News Read 5 September 2013


Hey, Samsung did something kinda dickish in an Apple sort of way

  • They promised everyone with a Samsung Galaxy the chance to download Jay-Z’s new album today for free
  • except it had to be the Galaxy III and not the II and certainly not the one
  • and if you were a poor sap like me who’s got a II then you were shit out of luck
  • but didn’t know it until you went to get the app and were told “THIS APP IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH YOUR DEVICE”
  • so I guess I’ve got 99 problems and my phone being not backwards compatible was one,
  • sigh.

Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global competitors in the smartphone business.

The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.

That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision was closely watched because it could help shape the balance of power in the growing smartphone and tablet computer business. It could also give Apple a tool it can use to more aggressively protect its innovations from a fleet of rivals flooding the market with competing devices.

While Apple received far less than the $2.5 billion it had asked for in the trial, lawyers said there was little question which side won. “This is a huge victory for Apple,” said Mark Lemley, a law professor at Stanford University.

The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.

In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.

The New York Times, "Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case."

Looks like I’m getting a Windows phone next.  :-)