(Very late) Weekend News Read 21 September 2013.
(Photo of one of two hydrogen bombs that landed in Goldsboro, NC — with its parachute still intact — via Wikipedia)
The huge explosion that destroyed a major missile-testing site near Tehran three weeks ago was a major setback for Iran’s most advanced long-range missile program, according to American and Israeli intelligence officials and missile technology experts.
In interviews, current and former officials said surveillance photos showed that the Iranian base was a central testing center for advanced solid-fuel missiles, an assessment backed by outside experts who have examined satellite photos showing that the base was almost completely leveled in the blast. Such missiles can be launched almost instantly, making them useful to Iran as a potential deterrent against pre-emptive attacks by Israel or the United States, and they are also better suited than older liquid-fuel designs for carrying warheads long distances.
It is still unclear what caused the explosion, with American officials saying they believe it was probably an accident, perhaps because of Iran’s inexperience with a volatile, dangerous technology. Iran declared it an accident, but subsequent discussions of the episode in the Iranian news media have referred to the chief of Iran’s missile program as one of the “martyrs” killed in the huge explosion. Some Iranian officials have talked of sabotage, but it is unclear whether that is based on evidence or surmise after several years in which Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated on Tehran’s streets, and a highly sophisticated computer worm has attacked its main uranium production facility.
Both American and Israeli officials, in discussing the explosion in recent days, showed little curiosity about its cause. “Anything that buys us time and delays the day when the Iranians might be able to mount a nuclear weapon on an accurate missile is a small victory,” one Western intelligence official who has been deeply involved in countering the Iranian nuclear program said this weekend. “At this point, we’ll take whatever we can get, however it happens.”
In addition to providing a potential deterrent to attackers, Iran’s advances in solid-fuel missile technology, and the concern it could eventually have intercontinental reach, have been at the heart of the Obama administration’s insistence on the need for new missile-defense programs.”
– The New York Times, “Blast That Leveled Base Seen as Big Setback to Iran’s Nuclear Program”
One person was killed and four were injured on Monday afternoon in an explosion at a nuclear waste treatment site in southern France, according to the French Nuclear Safety Authority.
The authority and local police officials said there had been no radiation leak. The site about 20 miles from Avignon, has no nuclear reactors, the authority said.
A spokesperson for the French Atomic Energy Commission told the television channel LCI that “nothing has made it outside.”
A spokesman for the French power utility EDF, which owns the site, said that “it is an industrial accident, not a nuclear one.”
“In this type of oven, there are two kinds of waste,” he told Agence France-Press, “metallic waste, like tools and pumps,” and “burnable waste, like gloves or technicians’ overalls.”
He said that “the fire caused by the explosion has been controlled.””
– The New York Times, “Blast At French Nuclear Site Is Said to Kill One.”
French nuclear explosion: Exactly what we wanted to wake up to. Here’s the AP’s story. More details as we get them, guys.
Just months after Fukushima; close to when Germany announces they’re shutting the plants down by next year; and mere days after we find out that that little East Coast earthquake actually tested the safety thresholds over at the North Anna plant in Virginia.
How can the nuclear industry continue to insist that their plants are safe?