BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER.

Welcome to the bleeding heart liberalism, Yankees fandom, Trekker and Lego geekdom and science nerdery and newshoundishness of BLOGGING via TYPEWRITER, praised by no less than ThinkProgress and Time Magazine and Buzzfeed and Comedy Central and Funny Or Die and it's all true! Read all about me.

Home
Movie Score A Day
Ask me questions!


Site Meter

 RSS Me!

Hollingsworth v. Perry.

  • ALITO: Seriously, Mr. Olson. If California provides all the substantive benefits of marriage to same-sex, domestic partnerships, are you seriously arguing that if California, if the case before us now were from a state that doesn't provide any of those benefits to same-sex couples, this case would come out differently?
  • OLSON: No, I don't think that it would come out differently, because the fundamental arguments we're making with respect to class-based distinctions; with respect to a fundamental right -- however, to the extent that my opponent, in the context of California, talks about childrearing, or adoptions, or rights of people to live together and that sort of thing --- those arguments can't be made on behalf of California because California has already made it a decision, that gay and lesbian individuals are perfectly suitable as parents; they're perfectly suitable to adopt; they're raising 37,000 children in California. And the expert on the other side specifically said and testified that they would be better off if their parents were allowed to get married.