Now Playing Tracks

The biggest single donor in political history, the casino billionaire Sheldon Adelson, mingled with other Romney backers at a postelection breakfast, fresh off a large gamble gone bad. Of the eight candidates he supported with tens of millions of dollars in contributions to “super PACs,” none were victorious on Tuesday.

And as calls came in on Wednesday from some of the donors who had poured more than $300 million into the pair of big-spending outside groups founded in part by Karl Rove — perhaps the leading political entrepreneur of the super PAC era — he offered them a grim upside: without us, the race would not have been as close as it was.

… Mr. Obama faced at least $386 million in negative advertising from super PACs and other outside spenders, more than double what the groups supporting him spent on the airwaves. Outside groups spent more than $37 million in Virginia’s Senate race and $30 million in Ohio’s, a majority to aid the Republican candidates.

The bulk of that outside money came from a relatively small group of wealthy donors, unleashed by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, which allowed unlimited contributions to super PACs. Harold Simmons, a Texas industrialist, gave $26.9 million to super PACs backing Mr. Romney and Republican candidates for the Senate. Joe Ricketts, the owner of the Chicago Cubs, spent close to $13 million to bankroll a super PAC attacking Mr. Obama over federal spending.

Bob Perry, a Texas homebuilder, poured more than $21 million into super PACs active in the presidential race and the Senate battles in Florida and Virginia, where Democrats narrowly prevailed. A donor network marshaled by Charles and David Koch, the billionaire industrialists and conservative philanthropists, reportedly sought to raise $400 million for tax-exempt groups that are not required to disclose their spending.

Mr. Adelson’s giving to super PACs and other outside groups came to more than $60 million, though in public Mr. Adelson did not seem overly concerned about the paltry returns on his investment.

“Paying bills,” Mr. Adelson said on Tuesday night when asked by a Norwegian reporter how he thought his donations had been spent. “That’s how you spend money. Either that or become a Jewish husband — you spend a lot of money.”

The New York Times, “Little to Show for Cash Flood by Big Donors.”

Now these same folks will whine about having to spend money paying their fair share of taxes and providing for healthcare for their employees, LOL.

110 notes

  1. queeriesandmore reblogged this from inothernews
  2. okorogariist reblogged this from inothernews
  3. gaulthique reblogged this from inothernews
  4. humboldtoctober reblogged this from inothernews
  5. bellumintus reblogged this from inothernews
  6. kerrsplat reblogged this from inothernews
  7. texarshead reblogged this from inothernews
  8. tallpawl reblogged this from inothernews
  9. midnight828 reblogged this from stillhidden
  10. analemma reblogged this from inothernews
  11. luckyfourteen reblogged this from inothernews
  12. tairngir reblogged this from inothernews
  13. itsacrisis reblogged this from inothernews
  14. withoutawarning reblogged this from timekiller-s
  15. emilyrose1025 said: But why is no one commenting on his use of “Jewish husband”? I think that’s slightly inappropriate.
  16. wmt-w-analicia reblogged this from inothernews
  17. zombieresponse-oh-no reblogged this from inothernews
  18. madder-as-hatter reblogged this from switchbladekiller
  19. switchbladekiller reblogged this from stillhidden
  20. vigwig reblogged this from inothernews
  21. basedjaysuave reblogged this from inothernews
  22. trixsiegrace reblogged this from inothernews
To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union