Now Playing Tracks

Teresa Sharp is fifty-three years old and has lived in a modest single-family house on Millsdale Street, in a suburb of Cincinnati, for nearly thirty-three years. A lifelong Democrat, she has voted in every Presidential election since she turned eighteen. So she was agitated when an official summons from the Hamilton County Board of Elections arrived in the mail last month. Hamilton County, which includes Cincinnati, is one of the most populous regions of the most fiercely contested state in the 2012 election. No Republican candidate has ever won the Presidency without carrying Ohio, and recent polls show Barack Obama and Mitt Romney almost even in the state. Every vote may matter, including those cast by the seven members of the Sharp family—Teresa, her husband, four grown children, and an elderly aunt—living in the Millsdale Street house.

The letter, which cited arcane legal statutes and was printed on government letterhead, was dated September 4th. “You are hereby notified that your right to vote has been challenged by a qualified elector,” it said. “The Hamilton County Board of Elections has scheduled a hearing regarding your right to vote on Monday, September 10th, 2012, at 8:30 A.M… . You have the right to appear and testify, call witnesses and be represented by counsel.”

“My first thought was, Oh, no!” Sharp, who is African-American, said. “They ain’t messing with us poor black folks! Who is challenging my right to vote?”

The answer to Sharp’s question is that a new watchdog group, the Ohio Voter Integrity Project, which polices voter-registration rolls in search of “electoral irregularities,” raised questions about her eligibility after consulting a government-compiled list of local properties and mistakenly identifying her house as a vacant lot.

The Sharp household had first been identified as suspicious by computer software that had been provided to the Ohio Voter Integrity Project by a national organization called True the Vote. The software, which has been distributed to similar groups around the country, is used to flag certain households, including those with six or more registered voters. This approach inevitably pinpoints many lower-income residents, students, and extended families.

JANE MAYER, writing in The New Yorker, “The Voter-Fraud Myth”

327 notes

  1. sony-xperia-z-kazuo-hirai-mclogi reblogged this from inothernews
  2. momlovestaiwan-ma-ying-jeou-kmt reblogged this from inothernews
  3. esotericalesbians reblogged this from inothernews
  4. akanshagautam reblogged this from inothernews
  5. angelawublog reblogged this from inothernews
  6. northxnorthwest reblogged this from bluebirdgirl
  7. bluebirdgirl reblogged this from suchcharminglives
  8. snh101188 reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  9. awesomeocelot reblogged this from inothernews
  10. chiataur reblogged this from inothernews
  11. simonschesthair reblogged this from inothernews
  12. teenagejesusandthejerk reblogged this from randomberlinchick
  13. jainf reblogged this from faboomama
  14. bethanysworld reblogged this from sarahlee310
  15. humboldtoctober reblogged this from inothernews
  16. riddaonthestorm reblogged this from sarahlee310
  17. thingspeopleasklibrarians reblogged this from faboomama
  18. mollydruwho reblogged this from qthewetsprocket
  19. faboomama reblogged this from dendroica
  20. katiedid92 reblogged this from jackpowerx
  21. jackpowerx reblogged this from questionall
  22. 21stcenturydems reblogged this from sarahlee310
  23. end-the-republican-mafia reblogged this from sarahlee310
  24. questionall reblogged this from sarahlee310
  25. 6dogs9cats reblogged this from sarahlee310
  26. lhpg reblogged this from sarahlee310
  27. sarahlee310 reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
  28. taeguktotadasana reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  29. t8k6 reblogged this from recall-all-republicans
To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union