Now Playing Tracks

About that proposed NYC soda ban.

  • The city’s restaurant industry wants you to think it’s opposed to Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed ban on many sugary drinks 16 ounces or larger because it’ll hurt their bottom line.
  • But such a ban would actually put more money in the industry’s pockets.
  • “But how?” you say.
  • Well, now that they can’t sell you a 32-ounce cup for, say, $2,
  • they can now sell you two 16-ounce cups instead for, say, $1.50.
  • Do the math!
  • Even at fast food restaurants and movie theatres that offer free refills,
  • they’ll be refilling a — you guessed it! — smaller cup.  Less product given out for free = padding the bottom line!
  • Your standard cup sizes at most food service establishments, BTW?
  • 12 ounces (kids), 21 ounces (“small”), 32 ounces (“medium”), and 44 ounces (“large”).
  • Standardizing a 16-ounce cup will be an inconvenience for the food service industry, that’s for sure
  • but once they start making the cups, all they gotta do is sell them
  • and believe me, restaurants will sell them
  • at whatever price point they damned well please
  • so give me another argument as to why the city shouldn’t ban these drinks
  • like “drinking that much soda on a regular basis might kill you” or something
  • and not this whiny restaurant industry argument
  • which has as much appeal as a 16-ounce cup 
  • of bullshit.

138 notes

  1. equalitywatch reblogged this from inothernews
  2. heyhalliehey reblogged this from inothernews
  3. stefanorubielli reblogged this from inothernews
  4. occupyingyourpolitics reblogged this from inothernews
  5. thepajmahal reblogged this from inothernews
  6. kgroth2 reblogged this from inothernews
  7. process-effect reblogged this from inothernews and added:
    He’s absolutely right. When I took my Cost Control course in culinary school, we learned to do specifically stuff like...
  8. theonlyscreamingbanshee reblogged this from inothernews
  9. the-great-time-war reblogged this from inothernews
  10. sketchbookmonsters reblogged this from inothernews
  11. ifyoureboredyoureboring said: Because if I want to I should be able to drink whatever I want? I think that’s a good enough reason not to spend time banning stupid shit.
  12. this-is-somestuff reblogged this from inothernews
  13. makeitepic416 reblogged this from inothernews
  14. fulero said: It’s not about that anyone thinks it isn’t bad for you, the stupid thing is that the ban doesn’t ban that much soda, it just bans that much soda in one cup. People will just buy two cups.
  15. me2ism reblogged this from inothernews and added:
    well, I oppose it the same reason I am bothered by the required calorie counts posted on menus—I resent the implication...
  16. thecircuspunk reblogged this from inothernews
  17. unumonline reblogged this from inothernews and added:
    The city’s restaurant industry wants you to think it’s opposed to Mayor Bloomberg’s proposed ban on many sugary drinks...
  18. sensiblestupidity reblogged this from inothernews
  19. scherbratsky said: I wrote alligator.org/opinion… a couple weeks ago and I swear it’s like I’m the only one who agrees with it.
To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union